Morbi bridge collapse: Compensation to kin of deceased will not affect proceedings, says Gujarat HC read full article at

The Gujarat Excessive Courtroom stated stated the compensation supplied by the agency, which was accountable for the renovation, operation, and upkeep of Morbi bridge, won’t influence the proceedings of the case.

The Gujarat Excessive Courtroom was listening to the case of the Morbi bridge collapse on Wednesday. (File picture)

By Saurabh Vaktania: The Gujarat Excessive Courtroom has stated the compensation supplied by the agency, which was accountable for the renovation, operation, and upkeep of the now-collapsed Morbi bridge, won’t influence the proceedings of the case.

Jaysukh Patel, the promoter of Ajanta Overa group which was accountable for the operation and upkeep of the British-era suspension bridge, appeared for the listening to of the suo motu case registered by the Gujarat Excessive Courtroom on the Morbi bridge collapse for the primary time on Wednesday. The bridge collapse had killed over 130 folks.

Additionally Learn | Suspension cables snapped, bridge got twisted: Expert lists out reasons behind Morbi mishap

Jaysukh Patel made an look after the police issued an arrest warrant in opposition to him and likewise issued a lookout round. This got here days after the Ajanta Over group’s promoter moved an anticipatory bail plea in a Morbi periods courtroom fearing arrest within the case. The courtroom had adjourned the listening to of the case to February 1.

Through the listening to of the case, Patel stated his firm was keen to supply ample compensation to the kin of the deceased. Nonetheless, the courtroom made it clear that the monetary assist wouldn’t have an effect on the proceedings in opposition to him.

The counsel representing Jaysukh Patel stated, “We want to compensate people in the tragic incident. Firstly, we want to arrange shelter and provide for the education of the seven children who became orphans, and help them get jobs once their studies are over. We also want to offer compensation to the kin of the deceased as well as those injured in the incident.”

Additionally Learn | What led to bridge collapse? Authorities’ blunder, crowd-induced vibrations or end of ‘service life’

The counsel stated Jaysukh Patel did numerous philanthropic work. “I was not earning anything from the bridge. I was pursued by top people to take up the renovation of Morbi bridge. Currently, I also look after Jam tower in Rajkot,” stated Patel via his counsel.

“We took the work of Morbi bridge to save heritage and not to earn money. I will not run away from the proceedings but I should be given a fair chance to defend myself. Fortune was not in our favour and thus, this disastrous incident took place. I don’t want to defend myself by way of offering fair compensation, but I should be given a fair chance with regard to the criminal and civil proceedings registered against me,” stated Patel.

Additionally Learn | Morbi tragedy: 9 bridge, flyover collapses that rattled India

In addition to asking Patel to correctly compensate folks, the Gujarat Excessive Courtroom stated, “We want to make one thing very clear. Compensation will not deter the state authorities from taking action, be it criminal or civil. Proceedings will continue.”

The lawyer defending Jaysukh Patel stated, “I am not running away from my responsibilities. However, all people here are passing the buck on me. Everyone is blaming me alone. Hence, I should be given a fair chance to defend myself and I voluntarily want to offer fair compensation to all the victims.”

Officers of the Morbi municipality, who had been additionally current for the listening to of the case, knowledgeable the courtroom that the Ajanta Overa group began work on the bridge with out getting permission or informing the involved authorities. “The firm also did not take permission while opening the bridge,” stated the civic officers.

Additionally Learn | ‘What to do with the money?’: Families of those killed in Morbi bridge collapse

In truth, the municipality alleged, the agency didn’t need the state authorities or another companies to intrude with their work. “The company decided on its own to open the bridge without taking permission,” stated the civic officers.

The Gujarat Excessive Courtroom got here down closely on the Morbi municipality. “What were you (municipality) doing? Why were you silent? Why did the Morbi municipality not take any action? Why did you not take over the bridge if it was in such a bad condition? You are such a powerful body, what were you doing?” requested the courtroom.

In the meantime, the Gujarat authorities knowledgeable the courtroom that there are a complete of 63 bridges in Gujarat, which want quick repairs, of which 23 want main and quick repairs. The federal government additionally knowledgeable work on 27 bridges is full whereas work on the remaining bridges is being completed on a battle footing.

Additionally Learn | Morbi bridge collapse | Nail the villains

Itemizing the following listening to of the case to February 20, the excessive courtroom sought correct particulars concerning the situation of the bridges and the work completed thus far by the state authorities within the subsequent listening to.


The suspension bridge on the Machchhu river in Morbi city collapsed on October 30 final yr, killing 135 individuals. The bridge was maintained and operated by Oreva Group as per an settlement signed with Morbi municipality.

It had signed a 15-year contract for the operation and upkeep of the bridge. The contract was signed between Morbi municipal company and Ajanta Oreva firm in March 2022 and was legitimate until 2037.

Additionally Learn | Morbi tragedy: Material used to construct bridge was of inferior quality, says expert

Following the tragedy that claimed over 130 lives, a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report revealed that rusty cables, damaged anchor pins, and free bolts had been among the many lapses that weren’t addressed whereas renovating the suspension bridge. The report additional revealed that the Oreva Group didn’t rent any skilled company to evaluate the load-bearing capability of the bridge earlier than throwing it open to the general public.

A Particular Investigation Crew (SIT) fashioned by the federal government to research the Morbi tragedy cited a number of lapses on the a part of Oreva Group in repairs, upkeep and operation of the British-era bridge.

#indianews #indiannews

About Lionel Messi

Check Also

Congress slowed India’s progress, country lost 6 decades: PM Modi’s broadside at grand old party amid opposition sloganeering in Rajya Sabha | India News read full article at

NEW DELHI: PM Modi on Thursday launched a recent offensive towards the Congress, this time …

Kim Jong Un Shows off daughter, nuclear missiles at North Korean parade read full article at

North Korean chief Kim Jong Un and his younger …

PM Modi to Launch Two More Trains from Mumbai, Maharashtra’s Count Touches 4 read full article at

Edited By: Oindrila Mukherjee Final Up to date: February 09, 2023, 19:35 IST One Vande …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *