Wizards of the Coast Responds to DUNGEONS & DRAGONS Fan Backlash and Reveals New OGL Plans — GeekTyrant read full article at worldnews365.me










Dungeons & Dragons publisher Wizards of the Coast has responded to the intense backlash that they have received from fans regarding the controversial changes that they have been planning for D&D’s Open Game License.

The statement was released on D&D Beyond, and Wizards of the Coast stated “it’s clear from the reaction that we rolled a 1.” Yes, yes they did. OGL allows creators and publishers to use the rules and ideas of the fantasy roleplaying game in their own works and the new OGL 1.1 system would have hurt the publishers and creators that help make D&D as popular as it has become. You can read the details about that here.

As for the statement they say that their team wants to be “good stewards of the game” and that the Open Game License was for fans, which is “why our early drafts of the new OGL included the provisions they did. That draft language was provided to content creators and publishers so their feedback could be considered before anything was finalized.”

The statement also lays out the new plan they are officially moving forward with. Read through the statement below and let us know what you think!

When we initially conceived of revising the OGL, it was with three major goals in mind. First, we wanted the ability to prevent the use of D&D content from being included in hateful and discriminatory products. Second, we wanted to address those attempting to use D&D in web3, blockchain games, and NFTs by making clear that OGL content is limited to tabletop roleplaying content like campaigns, modules, and supplements. And third, we wanted to ensure that the OGL is for the content creator, the homebrewer, the aspiring designer, our players, and the community—not major corporations to use for their own commercial and promotional purpose.

Driving these goals were two simple principles: (1) Our job is to be good stewards of the game, and (2) the OGL exists for the benefit of the fans. Nothing about those principles has wavered for a second. 

That was why our early drafts of the new OGL included the provisions they did. That draft language was provided to content creators and publishers so their feedback could be considered before anything was finalized. In addition to language allowing us to address discriminatory and hateful conduct and clarifying what types of products the OGL covers, our drafts included royalty language designed to apply to large corporations attempting to use OGL content. It was never our intent to impact the vast majority of the community.

However, it’s clear from the reaction that we rolled a 1. It has become clear that it is no longer possible to fully achieve all three goals while still staying true to our principles. So, here is what we are doing.

The next OGL will contain the provisions that allow us to protect and cultivate the inclusive environment we are trying to build and specify that it covers only content for TTRPGs. That means that other expressions, such as educational and charitable campaigns, livestreams, cosplay, VTT-uses, etc., will remain unaffected by any OGL update. Content already released under 1.0a will also remain unaffected. 

What it will not contain is any royalty structure. It also will not include the license back provision that some people were afraid was a means for us to steal work. That thought never crossed our minds. Under any new OGL, you will own the content you create. We won’t. Any language we put down will be crystal clear and unequivocal on that point. The license back language was intended to protect us and our partners from creators who incorrectly allege that we steal their work simply because of coincidental similarities. As we continue to invest in the game that we love and move forward with partnerships in film, television, and digital games, that risk is simply too great to ignore. The new OGL will contain provisions to address that risk, but we will do it without a license back and without suggesting we have rights to the content you create. Your ideas and imagination are what makes this game special, and that belongs to you.

A couple of last thoughts. First, we won’t be able to release the new OGL today, because we need to make sure we get it right, but it is coming. Second, you’re going to hear people say that they won, and we lost because making your voices heard forced us to change our plans. Those people will only be half right. They won—and so did we.

Our plan was always to solicit the input of our community before any update to the OGL; the drafts you’ve seen were attempting to do just that. We want to always delight fans and create experiences together that everyone loves. We realize we did not do that this time and we are sorry for that. Our goal was to get exactly the type of feedback on which provisions worked and which did not–which we ultimately got from you. Any change this major could only have been done well if we were willing to take that feedback, no matter how it was provided–so we are. Thank you for caring enough to let us know what works and what doesn’t, what you need and what scares you. Without knowing that, we can’t do our part to make the new OGL match our principles. Finally, we’d appreciate the chance to make this right. We love D&D’s devoted players and the creators who take them on so many incredible adventures. We won’t let you down.

#moviesnews #movies_news




About Joey Paur

Check Also

Jenna Ortega on her Beetlejuice Beetlejuice character read full article at worldnews365.me

Jenna Ortega reveals that her character in Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, Lydia’s daughter, is named Astrid and …

Edwin Hodge on Making a Movie With His Brother read full article at worldnews365.me

ComingSoon Editor-in-Chief Tyler Treese spoke with Parallel co-writer, producer, and star Edwin Hodge about the …

Drive Away Dolls Review read full article at worldnews365.me

Ethan Coen’s Drive Away Dolls aims to be a fun slice of midnaight madness, but …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *