Myles Lewis-Skelly red card: Howard Webb believes Arsenal defender's sending off at Wolves was wrong but defends referee Michael Oliver

Myles Lewis-Skelly red card: Howard Webb believes Arsenal defender's sending off at Wolves was wrong but defends referee Michael Oliver

Howard Webb says Myles Lewis-Skelly’s red card against Wolves was the wrong decision – but defended referee Michael Oliver and his officials by saying the call was not a “horrendous” one.

Lewis-Skelly was controversially sent off by Oliver in the first half of Arsenal’s 1-0 win over Wolves for fouling Matt Doherty, a decision which was later overturned after an appeal by Arsenal, who were handed a £65,000 fine for their on-field reaction to the red card.

In the latest episode of Match Official’s Mic’d Up, where the referee’s audio was released, VAR Darren England showed no desire to send Oliver to the VAR monitor, with no input from the assistant referees in the decision-making.

PGMOL chief Webb believes England should have intervened to notice the “glanced studs” from Lewis-Skelly that should have kept him on the pitch – despite the assistant VAR referencing it in the audio.

The VAR audio in full

Referee: “I’m going to go red card, mate. Red card on the ankle. Red card, serious foul play.”

VAR: “Just checking the red card for serious foul play. OK, it’s for serious foul play, not DOGSO (Denying an Obvious Goalscoring Opportunity).

“OK, for me the contact’s on the top of the foot.”

Assistant VAR: “I think he catches him on the side of the ankle first. It glances off the side of the ankle down onto the foot. So the first impact is more that Achilles area.”

VAR: “So first impact is on the Achilles, on the shin.”

Assistant VAR: “With no chance of playing the ball.”

VAR: “So, it’s high up above the ankle then it comes back down. OK, just get me the number please.”

Assistant VAR: “It’s number 49, Lewis-Skelly.”

VAR: “Michael, confirming the on-field decision of red card for serious foul play for Myles Lewis-Skelly. Away, 49. Check complete.”

“From the outset, we would prefer a yellow card in this situation,” said Webb on the latest episode of Match Official’s Mic’d Up.

“Clearly the referee on the day felt the actions of Myles Lewis-Skelly, he saw the player moving in towards an opponent without any ability or intention of playing the ball – with the intention of stopping the opponent. And the referee sees a raised foot make high contact and the opponent went down.

“The referee felt it was serious foul play, the VAR checked the footage to see if the call was clearly and obviously wrong and he felt it wasn’t – seeing that the contact was quite high up on the leg.

“But we know that for serious foul play, we need excessive force or brutality and what we see here is that high contact [just] glancing and coming off the leg quite quickly.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Ref Watch panel take a closer look at Arsenal’s Myles Lewis-Skelly’s red card against Wolves and discuss whether VAR should have intervened with the decision to send the 18-year-old off.

“So for that reason, everybody pretty much in the game has formed the same conclusion that this is falling short of serious foul play – because of that glancing contact. Because the studs don’t really go right into the leg, they glance in before coming down onto the foot.”

Webb: I understand Oliver’s thinking – it’s not a horrendous call

The decision to send Lewis-Skelly off caused great debate in the game. Among widespread criticism, Sky Sports’ Micah Richards said it was “the worst decision I’ve ever seen in Premier League football history”.

Webb believes there were some criteria in the Lewis-Skelly challenge to send him off, but the overall evidence pointed towards a yellow card.

“There are some considerations that might support a red card, but there are a whole host of others that say it is not quite there, so on balance we would rather this had been a yellow card,” said Webb.

“The VAR didn’t want to re-referee the situation, they were mindful of the referee’s call standing unless it is clearly and obviously wrong. They felt it wasn’t at that level on the day and decided to leave it as a red card on the field.

“I’ve heard this described as a really horrendous officiating decision. It’s not! I understand why the referee saw this on the day as a serious foul-play action.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky Sports News’ Soccer Special pundit Paul Merson reacts to the decision to overturn Myles Lewis-Skelly’s red card decision after Arsenal’s appeal.

“We have to be careful about slowing things down and freeze-framing things. We’ve talked about not doing that, it can distort reality. We have to look at it in full speed, it is glancing [studs] and does come off quite quickly.

“But it’s an understandable on-field decision. Yes we feel the VAR should have been involved, but at the same time I can kind of understand why that didn’t happen in the moment.

“We listen to the game, we feed back to the officials to try to ensure that we are in line with the expectations of the game and how we judge these things.”

Webb: Oliver abuse ‘wholly unacceptable’

Michael Oliver was subjected to appalling online abuse
Image:
Michael Oliver was subjected to online abuse

In the days following the incident, referee Oliver received social media abuse which the PGMOL described as “appalling.”

The refereeing body contacted the police and a number of investigations were launched. Oliver returned to refereeing straight away, taking charge of the Ipswich vs Southampton and Everton vs Liverpool fixtures in February.

“Really disappointing,” said Webb about the abuse directed at the officials following the Lewis-Skelly call.

“We know criticism comes our way, it’s part and parcel of the job. Everyone on the field does get criticised to some extent, managers do as well. But there’s a line, isn’t there?

“Nobody should be subject to threats, their families shouldn’t be subject to threats – whether that be officials or players. We have seen all participants being exposed to those sorts of things.

“So, really disappointing in that respect. People won’t always want to agree with the decision – yes they can criticise where they feel that is justifiable – but not to the level we saw in this situation where it led to threats against the referee, the officials in this game and their families. It’s wholly unacceptable.”

WATCH: The other incidents on Match Officials Mic’d Up

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PGMOL chief Howard Webb and Michael Owen analyse if Liverpool’s Diogo Jota have been booked for simulation after VAR overturned his penalty vs Wolves.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PGMOL chief Howard Webb and Michael Owen talk through why Liverpool were rightfully awarded a penalty against Bournemouth, after Cody Gakpo was brought down by Lewis Cook.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PGMOL chief Howard Webb explains why Bryan Mbeumo’s penalty had to be retaken against Crystal Palace following Marc Guehi’s involvement in play.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *